Gun Control
Did you know that "U.S. residents are 117 times more likely to die from a gunshot than people in Japan and 39 times more likely than people in Britain, countries where gun ownership is not permitted."?(Washington Times) By allowing just anyone to own a gun or not putting rules on the guns people do own we are keeping those odds stacked against us. I'm not suggesting that people shouldn't be able to own guns for protection or that we take away their constitutional right, I'm only suggesting that with the guns people own certain restrictions should be placed on them.
Guns can do a lot of damage when they end up in the wrong hands. In the United States alone there are many examples of this. Schools, Malls, and even the sidewalks we walk on everyday are becoming dangerous places to go because of people with guns. On April 16, 2007 Virginia Tech was devastated when a mentally ill man with a gun killed thirty-two and left more wounded. Some advocates of gun control believe that an easy way to make these occurrences less and less is to run tight background checks and have very strict rules regarding who can own a gun. If the person selling guns checks to see if the person is mentally ill or has a criminal history we can stop guns from getting in the hands of people who will miss use them and end up hurting themselves or others.
Another great tool to help save lives from the devastating effects of guns is promoting gun safety. Adding child safety locks and making sure people are properly taught how to use their guns can help save the lives of many. Always having control over your gun and knowing how to use it and how not to use it is key in gun ownership. Putting safety locks on the guns will allow guns that get into the hand of children to be less dangerous and stop them from shooting off on accident. Over the years there have been quite a few accidental deaths because children have gotten a hold of guns. With new laws in place we could decrease these deaths in great amounts.
There are some concerns about gun restrictions though. If we begin to limit who can own a gun or take away that right completely we are taking away that person's right to defend themselves. Without guns to protect themselves the rate of crime will rise because "burglars admit to fearing armed homeowners more than the police." (Conservapedia) With guns to protect ourselves the U.S. crime rate is lower. The guns people carry around scare away that man waiting to steal your purse or break into your house. Without that sense of security many people will be more paranoid and afraid to live their day to day lives.
Gun ownership is linked to more than just crime. It is also linked to suicide. As we give more and more unstable members of our society guns we run the risk of escalating suicides. Handing a gun to a depressed person is like handing a grenade to a suicide bomber, not a good combination. We could prevent a lot of suicides by taking away the tools they need to actually kill themselves, the guns.
In today's political campaign each runner has their own opinion on how gun control should be taken into account in our society. Barak Obama believes that we should make "sure the Second Amendment is respected and that people are able to lawfully own guns, but that we also start cracking down on the kinds of abuses of firearms that we see on the streets" ( On the Issues) On the other hand Hillary Clinton believes "We do need to crack down on illegal gun dealers. This is something that I would like to see more of. We need to enforce the laws that we have on the books. I would also work to reinstate the assault weapons ban. We now have, once again, police deaths going up around the country and in large measure because bad guys now have assault weapons again." (On the Issues) Even the republicans have their own view as Mr. McCain expresses when he says "that the right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is a fundamental, individual Constitutional right. We have a responsibility to ensure that criminals who violate the law are prosecuted to the fullest, rather than restricting the rights of law abiding citizens."(On The Issues) The issue of gun control, as you can see, has become a major issue in political debate. Whether you are a republican or a demarcate you have to answer at some point, where do I stand on this issue?, and is the person I am voting for going to implement laws that will guide this country in the right direction.
Many also suggest that controlling the gun issue means you need to completely eliminate the ownership of guns in the U.S. but a lot believe this is not true. As long as background checks are done to show that the person is capable of using a gun and using it for the right reasons there is no reason he or she should not be allowed to own a gun. I also believe that child safety locks are a great security feature and should be used on every gun. With these and a few laws to restrict the use of guns, we can reduce the amount of shootings and accidents that happen in the United States every year.
11 comments:
I couldn't agree more. I don't think it would be that difficult to check someone's backround to see if they can have a gun. If they've committed any type of crime I don't think they should be able to get one. In Omaha especially, we hear about a lot of drive by shootings, and I think if gun control was better enforced we wouldn't hear about them as much.
There are many ways to interpret the 2nd amendment and in order to uphold it, and at the same time keep ourselves from killing each other is this:
1)the stricter backround checks and educating gun owners as stated before.
2)Make assault rifles illegal for the average citizen. I don't think you need an AK-47 or an M-4 to hunt deer and if you think it is necessary for your own safety, I don't think your average home invader has military grade gear.
3) Ban having concealed weapons. Your average American does not have to the proper training to handle a firearm in a gunfight and is a danger to themselves and others around them. A clumsy citizen with a pistol is a bad mix.
Unfortunately, even with these restrictions we will never be able to fully control people getting hold of a couple pistols and reenacting (for real) what happend at VA Tech.
I totally agree. Yes, we can't deny a person's Constitutional rights, but we can only uphold that right so long as it doesn't infringe upon everyone else's constitutional right. We need to run stricter background checks, make it harder to acquire a gun, and crack down on people illegally selling guns. It is just too dangerous.
In my belief gun control is one of the hardest things to enforce because unlike drugs or other illicit material, in many cases guns are totally legal. The problem is that the dealers who sell the guns and should be doing the background checks, don't have the motivation to do so. This means that we need to make it the governments responcibility to uphold and enforce these laws in the most strict policy possible. Now are guns an absolute evil? No. My family has a pistol from my grandfather that has been sitting in my dads closet for around three years now. So the basic idea is that guns are fine and should be allowed as long as they are being used responsibly and by licensed owners.
by i.heart.doritos.
I think a good solution to the gun problem would be completing background (mental illnes, police records, etc.) and a gun safety course before being able to own a gun. Most people have to take drivers ed or some sort of test to get their license to drive a car, which is not even technically a weapon. Why not make gun owners take a gun ed class?
I know it is a constitutional right to carry a firearm, but there is one thing to keep in mind. In the 1700's, there weren't any drive-bys, gang shootings and school shootings sprinkled into popular culture like there is today.
Weeks ago, a 13 year old girl invited her friend over her house. She was alone when her friend dropped buy. Then, they both decided they'll hang out on her dad's room because they grew board watching TV. Apparently, her dad was careless that he left his gun on his bed. Guessing what happened, the two kids might have thought it's funner to play with a gun. Then the girl pulled the trigger "accidentally" while the gun is directed on her friend's chest. The girl died and the girl who shot her friend was put in jail as an adult. But what I really find ridiculous is that the suspect's father "blame her daughter" for going to his room and played with a gun. I think that is just wrong. First of all, children are curious. They ignite their curiosity which invite them to troubles but this could be avoided if parents are more responsible and enforce right discipline to their kids. The man wasn't even charged and I think he would careless if his child is in prison. (Source: TV Patrol)
But then again, that is in the Philippines but it could happen anywhere. I really disagree that people can have guns when THEY wanted or have the money to have one. Guns should be more restrict.
I agree completely with scott. The 2nd amendment can be interpreted in multiple ways, and we need to choose the way that is most logical.
Personally, I don't think a person dressed up as Mickey Mouse at Disneyland should be allowed to carry around concealed wepons, don't you?
I agree. I think that the government should enforce strict laws about background checks before anyone can purchase a gun, used or unused. Also, people should be required to take a gun safety test before they can get it. This will help educate citizens about the dangers of guns (helping to eliminate any accidental misfirings). On the flip side, Who's to say that the people who use the guns for crimes, actually bought them? If I was going to commit a murder, I certainly wouldn't use my own registered gun. Criminals would most likely steal it anyways. We should make gun-owners store their guns in a secure place where nobody can tamper with them.
A bit of devils advocate, and a bit of personal belief here. Gun control is not logical, espically if it is all weapons in general. The main reason people use, "OH NO THE BAD GUYZ GOT GUNZ," doesn't apply. They're bad guys. They WILL find ways to get what they need, whether it be crack, guns, armor, bomb supplies, etc. Also, it is Nebraska state law to do a background check on every person before they buy a gun, but the problem isn't that. Most of the people who do violence with guns are people that buy them off of the street, steals them, or things like that. People are violent by nature, and guns are just a tool humans use, like a hammer, or a screwdriver.
As another commentor said, making assault rifles illegal would be acceptable, no reason for us to have a fully automatic weapon. Concealed weapons, however, is different. The only way you can have a concealed weapons is when you pass a class, register your weapon, and even then, you can't take it everywhere. So the people that do have them know how to use them.
Sorry for the long rant, this one just hits a bit close, espically when everyone says "YEAH, GUNS ARE BAD LETS BAN THEM!"
I believe that, of course, the restrictions on the amount of guns distributed should be reduced. But everyone seems to think that by doing this, guns will be safely locked away from the "bad guys".
Well for these "bad guys", being able to get hold of a gun won't be so difficult. Illegal drugs aren't allowed of course but people always seem to find a way to get them. They find dealers who will sell anything to anyone, as long as they give them money. This will also occur with the people who would be illegally selling guns. They are not going to do a background check or see if their buyer has any mental illnesses because they don't care. They are set on the idea to sell as long as it keeps them in business.
And with suicides, sure people find guns and kill themselves, but thats not the only way they do it. If someone is suicidal, they will find any way to take their own life. Not only with gun use. Now firearms are considered the most common way to commit suicide, but hanging is the second most common, as said on healthyplace.com. Without guns people will resort to hanging themselves. Then what will we do, ban rope?
I'm not saying that we shouldn't limit who can recieve a gun, but i am just trying to get the point across that people can always find a way to get something they want.
ok i have one thing to say about this. if you were to limit/restrict guns too much all it does is hurt the law abiding people. ex. if i were a bad guy im sure as heck not going to buy a gun from a store, no, I'd buy it from some other source. (vala the law didn't do anything... and i have a gun, I'm gonna go shoot some one who doesn't have a gun because they couldn't get one.) now im not saying no rules we need rules/regs, or things will get bad, but if i want to get my hands on a gun i can do it any time. (take it in to consideration that's all I'm saying.)
Post a Comment